ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2026
Measuring age-related differences in phonetic gradiency with the visual analogue scale and eye tracking.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners vary in their sensitivity to acoustic-phonetic variation. In this study, we explored different ways of measuring such sensitivity. Study 1 used a visual analogue scale (VAS) task that elicited ratings for a set of four phonetic continua. Study 2 used a two-alternative forced choice task with eye tracking, which provided both binary response data and fine-grained fixation data for the same phonetic continua as study 1. In both studies, we asked how patterns of phonetic perception changed over the course of the adult lifespan by comparing a younger adult sample (ages 18 - 25) to an older adult sample (age 50+). In addition, we conducted several assessments to examine how language skill, hearing acuity, and speech-in-noise perception were associated with individual differences in phonetic categorization. We found that older adults displayed more categorical (as opposed to more gradient) patterns of perception than younger adults, particularly in the VAS task, where age-related differences persisted even after controlling for hearing loss and speech-in-noise perception. There was also evidence of more categorical patterns of perception among older adults in the eye tracking measures. Overall, these data suggest that VAS tasks may be particularly sensitive to both age-related factors and differences in language skill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.