SynthesisEpidemiologic reviews2026
Community and societal influences on loneliness and social isolation among young adults: a systematic review of observational studies.
Synthesis in Epidemiologic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness and social isolation are emerging public health concerns among young adults, yet the role of community and societal factors remains poorly understood. Existing research has predominantly focused on individual or interpersonal determinants. This systematic review synthesized observational evidence on community- and societal-level factors associated with loneliness and social isolation among young adults aged 18-30 years. Five databases were searched for observational studies examining place-based community or societal exposures and loneliness or social isolation outcomes. Thirteen eligible studies were identified, and a structured narrative synthesis was undertaken. The exposure variables explored were diverse. Neighborhood characteristics (including trust, safety, and atmosphere), community participation, cultural and societal norms, and structural conditions demonstrated consistent associations with loneliness. Greater neighborhood cohesion, safety, and belonging were protective, whereas neighborhood disorder, minority status, perceived discrimination, and individualistic cultural orientations were associated with greater loneliness. Evidence for social isolation was sparse and methodologically heterogeneous, though area-level disadvantage and remoteness showed emerging relevance. Most studies had a cross-sectional design, and the ways loneliness and social isolation were measured across studies were heterogenous. Community and societal determinants meaningfully shape young adults' experiences of loneliness, but evidence for social isolation remains limited. Findings highlight the need for longitudinal research, improved consistency in the use of measurement tools, and further examination of moderators between individual factors and community influences, which will all contribute to the development of multilevel public health strategies addressing structural and neighborhood conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.