SynthesisJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Assessing professional caregiver burden related to patient agitation in dementia: A systematic review of measurement scales.
Synthesis in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAgitation is a common behavioral and psychological symptom of dementia that places significant burden on caregivers. While its impact on family caregivers is well-documented, its effect on professional caregivers remains underexplored. Additionally, it is unclear whether existing caregiver burden scales adequately capture the International Psychogeriatric Association's (IPA) definition of agitation. Since agitation requires different treatment approaches than cognitive impairment, its distinct burden warrants further investigation.ObjectiveThis systematic review examined scales used to assess professional caregiver burden related to agitation in dementia.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and ICHUSHI for English and Japanese articles published during January 1980-August 2024. Studies included professional caregivers, either exclusively or alongside informal caregivers. Key outcomes were the number and frequency of scales, target population, and agitation coverage within the scales.ResultsWe identified 52 articles: 22 focused exclusively on professional caregivers, and 30 included both types. Publications involving both caregiver types increased notably in the last decade. Across studies, 39 scales were used. The Zarit Burden Interview (n = 21) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (n = 15) were most frequent. Sixteen scales targeted the general population; 11 each were designed for professional and informal caregivers, and one for both. Most scales did not fully reflect the IPA's definition of agitation. Scales for professional caregivers also included work-related factors like coworker conflicts and administrative workload.ConclusionsThere is a critical gap in validated scales to measure agitation-related burden in professional dementia caregivers. Specialized tools are urgently needed to assess this burden and guide support strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.