Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837399›Full record

ArticleClinical nutrition research2026

Clinical field survey and multidisciplinary expert in-depth interview study on food for special medical purpose products for patients.

Ju Hee Kang, Hee-Jung Park, Hyo Jeong Lim, Jung Joo Lee, Bo-Eun Kim, Eun Joo Bae, Yeon Hee Lee, Dal Lae Ju, Young Ran Kim, Jin-Hee Yeom and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nutrition research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ju Hee KangDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Suwon Women's University, Hwaseong, Korea.
Hee-Jung ParkDepartment of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
Hyo Jeong LimDepartment of Food & Medical Products Regulatory Policy, Graduate School, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Joo LeeNutrition Team, Yonsei University Yongin Severance Hospital, Yongin, Korea.
Bo-Eun KimDepartment of Nutrition, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Joo BaeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Yeon Hee LeeDepartment of Food Service and Clinical Nutrition, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
Dal Lae JuDepartment of Food Service and Nutrition Care, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Young Ran KimDepartment of Nutrition Care, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Hee YeomThe Korean Society of Clinical Nutrition, Seoul, Korea.
Hee-Sook LimDepartment of Gerontology, Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.
Ha-Neul KimDepartment of Gerontology, Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.
Seul Bi LeeDepartment of Medical Nutrition, Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.
Seo-Yeon ParkDepartment of Foodservice Management and Nutrition, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Joon BaekDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Hanyang Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
Yoo Kyoung ParkDepartment of Medical Nutrition, Graduate School of East-West Medical Science, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFood for special medical purpose (FSMP) has become essential in clinical nutrition care. However, comprehensive data on FSMP utilization practices among healthcare professionals in South Korea are limited. This study aimed to investigate perceptions, current practices, and needs regarding FSMP among healthcare professionals.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a cross-sectional survey of 417 healthcare professionals (47 physicians, 219 nurses, and 151 dietitians) from 90 institutions with focus group interviews of 24 Nutrition Support Team members from six institutions. Data were collected from May to October 2025.

resultsSubstantial interphysician variability was observed in documentation for enteral formula prescriptions. Infusion rates were documented in 9.2% of the physician orders; feeding method was recorded in 14.1%. Across all professional groups, diarrhea was the most common reason for changing enteral formulas (36%-39%). In education related enteral formulas, 59.6% of the physicians expected dietitians to educate patients; however, this role was most commonly performed by nurses (59.8%). Dietitians prioritized hygiene (66.9%) and safety (64.2%) when selecting products, and 84.1% of the institutions were providing oral nutritional supplements.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for standardized prescription documentation, evidence-based feeding protocols, and clearly defined professional roles in multidisciplinary frameworks, to optimize FSMP utilization.

Indexed as

Enteral nutritionFocus groupsHealth care surveysSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41837399
PMCPMC13007802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.