ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026
Spatial heterogeneity of antibody-drug conjugate targets in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, with limited therapeutic options, few patients showing targetable molecular changes. New therapeutic strategies are necessary. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as alternative therapeutic strategies across various cancer types. Herein, we analyze the expression and spatial heterogeneity (six cores per patients) of three ADC targets (c-MET, NECTIN4, and TROP-2) in a cohort of 62 PDAC patients (1,116 tissue cores) and associate their levels with clinicopathological and genomic parameters, and the expression of immune checkpoints. c-MET exhibited significantly higher expression at the tumor front versus tumor center, along with notable intratumoral heterogeneity. In contrast, NECTIN4 and TROP-2 displayed homogeneous expression patterns, with NECTIN4 being absent in approximately two-thirds of cases, while TROP-2 showed consistently strong positivity across tumor regions (98% 3+). By simulating sampling sufficiency for reliable scoring, we observed that, for c-MET, two tumor samples were sufficient to achieve a maximum score of 1+, while for higher scores (2+ and 3+), four samples were required. For NECTIN4, four samples were necessary to detect scores of 1+ and 2+. For TROP-2, for a 3+ score, just two samples were sufficient to reach the maximum score. c-MET or TROP-2 expression scores were not associated with any clinicopathological parameters. In contrast, NECTIN4 expression showed an association with tumor grade. Correlations with immune checkpoints revealed that high TROP-2 expression was inversely correlated with PD-L1 expression. For all three markers no significant differences in expression were found between SMAD4 wild-type and SMAD4-mutated tumors, nor between TP53 wild-type and TP53-mutated tumors. Furthermore, analysis of lymph node and distant (liver and peritoneal) metastases revealed significantly higher c-MET and NECTIN4 expression in the metastatic setting. In conclusion, TROP-2 is highly expressed in most PDACs, independent of clinicopathological and genomic parameters, and inversely correlating with PD-L1, making TROP-2 an ideal ADC target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.