ReviewJournal of applied toxicology : JAT2026
Ivermectin Toxicity in Humans and Animals: Clinical Spectrum, Mechanisms, and Management.
Review in Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elucidating adverse drug reactions and underlying molecular mechanisms of ivermectin through pharmacovigilance and multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ivermectin is a widely used macrocyclic lactone with established efficacy against a broad range of parasitic infections in humans and animals and a long-standing reputation for clinical safety. However, increasing evidence indicates that ivermectin can produce clinically relevant toxicity under specific conditions, particularly involving the central nervous system. This review integrates findings from controlled human trials, pharmacovigilance data, clinical case reports, experimental animal studies, and environmental investigations to comprehensively characterize the toxicological profile of ivermectin. Early randomized, placebo-controlled studies in healthy volunteers demonstrated that ivermectin is generally well tolerated, even at doses substantially exceeding approved therapeutic levels, with predominantly mild and transient adverse events and no significant neurological toxicity under controlled conditions. In contrast, post-marketing surveillance and real-world clinical reports have identified rare but severe neurotoxic events, including encephalopathy, seizures, coma, and death, occurring after supratherapeutic exposure and, in susceptible individuals, even at standard therapeutic doses. Converging human and animal evidence highlights impairment or saturation of blood-brain barrier protection, particularly dysfunction of P-glycoprotein (ABCB1/MDR1)-mediated efflux, as a central determinant of ivermectin neurotoxicity. Animal studies further demonstrate marked species-, breed-, age-, dose-, and route-dependent susceptibility, with neonatal animals, genetically predisposed dog breeds, and models exposed to transporter inhibition or repeated high-dose regimens showing pronounced vulnerability. While neurotoxicity is often functional and reversible at lower exposures, high or cumulative dosing can lead to structural neuropathology and multi-organ injury. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified these risks through widespread off-label use, especially of veterinary formulations, resulting in a substantial increase in toxic exposures without demonstrated clinical benefit. Overall, ivermectin toxicity emerges as a predictable consequence of interactions between pharmacokinetics, transporter biology, exposure patterns, and host-specific factors rather than an inherent contradiction of its therapeutic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.