Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837242›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Enhancing crack detection and severity assessment in historical Tabiya basins using U-Net and adaptive thresholding.

Hafsa Matich, Jamal Attmani, Hajar Mousannif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hafsa MatichLISI Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Jamal AttmaniNational School of Applied Sciences of Marrakech, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Hajar MousannifLISI Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation of the historical Tabiya water basins remains paramount, with consideration being their cultural and architectural importance, though structural degeneration like surface cracking poses a formidable challenge to conservation work. Since the traditional methods of inspection are often subjective, tedious, and prone to error, these limitations are tackled in this study by means of presenting an automated system for surface crack detection and segmentation based on artificial intelligence and computer vision techniques. High-resolution images were captured on-site using a Canon EOS 1100D camera and analyzed within a comparative deep learning framework using four models, namely U-Net with MobileNetV2, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNetB7 backbones. The proposed system performs crack detection and segmentation, as well as quantitative measurements, including crack length, width, and severity assessment through skeletonization, a crack length estimation algorithm, and a crack width extraction method. Experimental results indicated that the MobileNetV2-based model outperformed all other tested architectures, with an accuracy of 98.7%, a recall of 98.2%, a precision of 99.1%, and an F1-score of 98.6%. Furthermore, the developed framework has also been deployed as a web application that allows users to upload or drag and drop images and select from four available models for automated analysis. This integrated system represents a strong, precise, and user-friendly tool for the digital preservation and structural monitoring of heritage water infrastructure.

Indexed as

crack detectiondeep learningfully convolutional networkheritage buildingsemantic segmentationU-Net adaptive thresholding

Identifiers

PMID41837242
PMCPMC12982177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.