Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837220›Full record

ArticleACS materials Au2026

Data-Efficient Design of High-Entropy Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Using Active Learning.

Joakim Brorsson, Henrik Klein Moberg, Joel Hildingsson, Jonatan Gastaldi, Tobias Mattisson, Anders Hellman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS materials Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joakim BrorssonDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7118-4930
Henrik Klein MobergDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joel HildingssonDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jonatan GastaldiDepartment of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4948-2209
Tobias MattissonDepartment of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-7434
Anders HellmanDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1821-159X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-entropy materials, first demonstrated in metallic alloys and later extended to oxides and other systems, unlock a vast compositional space with properties suited for catalysis, energy, and structural materials. However, the high compositional complexity makes systematic exploration challenging, and only a small portion of the design space has been studied. To address this, we introduce an active learning strategy that integrates predictive modeling, uncertainty estimation, and iterative sampling to efficiently navigate embedded compositional material spaces. This approach continuously learns from previous evaluations, focusing subsequent searches on the most promising regions while reducing both time and data requirements. We demonstrate this methodology in the search for high-entropy oxygen carriers for chemical looping, where it rapidly accelerates discovery and identifies promising candidates more effectively than conventional trial-and-error or grid-search approaches. Importantly, this strategy is general and well-suited to exploring the vast space of multicomponent materials.

Indexed as

active learningchemical loopingfirst-principleshigh entropy oxidesmachine learning potentialsmaterials discoveryoxygen carriers

Identifiers

PMID41837220
PMCPMC12983108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.