ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Comparison of spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and multiple breath washout in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is associated with ventilation defects and heterogeneous impairment of pulmonary function. Spirometry alone may underestimate PCD severity and complexity. This study aimed to evaluate spirometry, multiple breath washout (MBW), and impulse oscillometry (IOS) in children with PCD and healthy controls. Methods: In this cross-sectional, prospective study, participants included children aged 6-18 years with PCD and healthy age-matched controls. Pulmonary function tests using MBW, IOS, and spirometry were conducted on the same day for all participants. Results: Thirty-two children with PCD (cwPCD) (median age 16.5 years) and 44 age-matched healthy controls (median age 15.7 years) were studied. PCD was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 (FEV1) percent predicted (pp), forced vital capacity (FVC) pp, FEV1/FVC, reactance 5 (X5); as well as higher resistance 5 (R5), R10, R15, R20, resonance frequency (Fres) and lung clearance index (LCI) 2.5% mean values ( Conclusion: This is one of the few studies comparing MBW, IOS, and spirometry in cwPCD. The study has shown that there are significant differences in spirometry and MBW between cwPCD and healthy controls. MBW can detect airway anomalies earlier than spirometry and may be used in follow-up as an alternative pulmonary function test in cwPCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.