ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: a typical case and review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic Non-bacterial Osteomyelitis (CNO) is a rare autoinflammatory bone disease primarily affecting children and adolescents. The disease presents with a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from mild unifocal lesions to severe, recurrent multifocal bone inflammation. Its etiology remains unclear, making diagnosis challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. Methods: We report the case of a 14-year-old girl who presented with recurrent swelling and pain in the left clavicle. After multiple admissions, the patient underwent extensive diagnostic workup, including laboratory tests, imaging, and biopsies, which showcased typical imaging and histopathological findings throughout the disease progression, helping to rule out infections and malignancies. Based on clinical findings and the exclusion of other conditions, she was diagnosed with CNO. Treatment included NSAIDs, intravenous antibiotics, and oral medications such as diclofenac sodium, naproxen, methotrexate, and calcitriol. Results: During the one-year follow-up after initial treatment, the patient experienced recurrent symptoms, including swelling and pain in the left clavicle. After escalation to intravenous pamidronate and subcutaneous adalimumab, the patient achieved sustained clinical remission. During the subsequent two-year follow-up, no further symptom recurrence was observed. Conclusion: CNO is generally diagnosed by exclusion, with MRI being the gold standard for detecting asymptomatic lesions and assessing disease activity. Treatment typically involves NSAIDs, with bisphosphonates and biologics increasingly used in refractory cases. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing CNO, highlighting the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is essential to establish standardized diagnostic criteria and optimize treatment strategies for this rare condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.