Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837173›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2026

Open Tibial Fractures Part 2: A Narrative Review of Definitive Treatment and Potential Applicability to the Southern African Context.

Erik Hohmann, Maketo Molepo, Maritz Laubscher, Kevin Tetsworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erik HohmannMedical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1991-8682
Maketo MolepoMedical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7306-4051
Maritz LaubscherDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5989-8383
Kevin TetsworthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3069-4141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of contemporary definitive treatment options, potential complications and clinical outcomes for open tibial shaft fractures and while assessing their relevance and applicability within South African context. Treatment options available in high-income countries may not be accessible in low-resource settings, requiring adaptations to the treatment approach based on local conditions. Only one African country has attempted to establish principal guidelines for the treatment of open tibial fractures through a consensus-based approach. These guidelines cover primary assessment, antibiotics, initial stabilization, referral criteria, debridement and irrigation, documentation, wound closure, soft-tissue management, amputation, and definitive internal fixation. Unfortunately, definitive fracture management recommendations for African low-resource countries are not yet available. There is a lack of data regarding the treatment of open tibial fractures in low-resource countries, particularly in regional and rural areas. Existing guidelines address antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment, debridement and lavage, initial surgical fixation, wound closure (both primary and definitive), soft-tissue management (including flap coverage), and bone fragment retention, all adapted to local resource availability. However, guidelines for definitive treatment remain unavailable. Treatment options recommended by high-income countries are largely unsuitable, and Southern African nations should focus on developing guidelines tailored to their available resources.

Indexed as

low-resource countriesmanagementopen tibial fracturesreviewSouthern Africa

Identifiers

PMID41837173
PMCPMC12983156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.