ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Precision management of medullary thyroid carcinoma: a dynamic framework integrating biomarkers, genotyping, and risk stratification.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a heterogeneous neuroendocrine malignancy in which outcomes are shaped by tumor burden, locoregional spread, and molecular context. Precision management therefore requires explicit separation of hereditary MTC driven by germline RET variants from presumed sporadic disease, and a structured integration of serum biomarkers, imaging, pathology, and genotype. This review synthesizes actionable evidence on calcitonin (Ctn) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) baseline values and kinetics, universal germline RET testing, and tumor somatic profiling in advanced or progressive disease, and highlights desmoplastic stromal reaction (DSR) as an underused postoperative risk modifier in sporadic MTC. We propose a clinician-facing three-panel workflow: Panel A standardizes initial evaluation and mandates germline RET testing for all patients; Panel B outlines genotype- and staging-informed surgery and surveillance for hereditary disease, including pediatric carriers; and Panel C provides a staged approach for sporadic MTC in which imaging directs compartment selection and early postoperative DSR and biochemical response tailor surveillance intensity and thresholds for re-staging and re-intervention. By aligning decision nodes with real-world scenarios and using consistent surgical terminology, this framework offers a testable blueprint for precision surgery, surveillance stratification, and genotype-directed systemic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.