ReviewCardiac failure review2026
Genetics in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: An Evolving Clinical Landscape.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organelle network dysfunction in primary cardiomyopathy: An integrated perspective on pathogenesis and therapeutics.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Review
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Era of Precision Medicine: Redefining Diagnosis, Therapeutics and Risk.Cardiac failure review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease and is characterised by unexplained increased wall thickness. Traditionally considered a monogenic disorder, emerging evidence highlights its complex genetic architecture. Genetic testing is now a cornerstone for diagnosis and family screening, although its prognostic and therapeutic impact at the individual level remains limited at present but is expected to grow as more comprehensive approaches are developed. Aimed at general cardiologists, this review summarises the benefits and limitations of current knowledge and genetic testing in HCM, and offers practical guidance on patient selection, interpretation of results, and integration into routine care. In this context, the challenge posed by variants of uncertain significance is discussed, and current and emerging strategies for their re-interpretation are outlined in brief. An updated overview is also provided of the genetic landscape, covering sarcomeric and non-sarcomeric genes, HCM phenocopies and new inheritance models, including oligogenic and polygenic mechanisms. Additionally, the potential of expanded genetic panels incorporating novel candidate genes and deep intronic and structural variants is highlighted. As gene therapy emerges as a future therapeutic option, precise molecular diagnosis will be essential for integrating genetic insights into routine clinical practice and advancing personalised care in HCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.