ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Home intense pulsed light (IPL) device is a useful tool to decrease hair burden in pilonidal patients - a case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Patients with pilonidal disease (PD) often receive laser epilation to reduce hair burden at the gluteal cleft to decrease symptom recurrence. Laser epilation sessions can be burdensome for patients who need to travel long distance to clinic or are away from home for extended periods of time. In this informal case series, we describe four PD patients who manage epilation with intense pulsed light (IPL) devices at home. Case Presentation: Four PD patients were referred to our Pilonidal Care Clinic and underwent surgical excision. They were all started on regular laser epilation in the clinic. Due to the long travel distance to the clinic, temporary relocating elsewhere, or ease of treatment, they switched to using home IPL for long-term epilation. They reported no injury associated with the IPL use and no recurrence of PD after a follow-up period between 1-3 years. Clinical Discussion: Recurrence of PD symptoms has been shown to decrease with regular laser epilation. However, there is considerable burden in frequent traveling to the clinic to receive laser therapy. Our cases demonstrate that home IPL can be safely used to decrease hair burden in PD and minimize future PD recurrence. Conclusion: IPL devices can serve as an effective and convenient option for epilation at home to prevent PD recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.