Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837085›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

Delayed right ventricular perforation 3 years after permanent pacemaker implantation: a case report.

Sinh Hien Nguyen, Thanh Hung Ngo, Pham Thi Hue

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sinh Hien NguyenDepartment of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Hanoi Heart Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thanh Hung NgoDepartment of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Hanoi Heart Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6674-6954
Pham Thi HueFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) lead perforation is an uncommon but serious complication of pacemaker implantation. Most cases occur acutely or subacutely, while very late perforations - beyond 1 year - are exceedingly rare and often unexpected. Presentation of case: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with syncope and cardiac arrest 3 years after permanent pacemaker implantation. Imaging revealed cardiac tamponade due to RV lead perforation. The patient underwent emergency median sternotomy, lead extraction, and RV repair without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Postoperatively, spontaneous sinus rhythm was preserved, and pacemaker reimplantation was not required. Discussion: Very late lead perforation is rarely reported, especially in young patients without risk factors. This case highlights the unpredictable nature of the complication, the value of contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosis, and key surgical considerations, including when bypass may be avoided and when reimplantation is unnecessary. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the importance of long-term surveillance in pacemaker recipients and individualized management strategies for delayed RV lead perforation.

Indexed as

cardiac tamponadelate lead perforationlead extractionpacemaker complicationright ventricular perforation

Identifiers

PMID41837085
PMCPMC12981887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.