Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837072›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

Short-term outcomes and surgical technique of cecum and appendix-based urinary diversion in radical cystectomy patients: a case series.

Mohammad Soleimani, Farzad Allameh, Mehran Moghimian, Sina Samenezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad SoleimaniClinical Development Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad AllamehMen's Health & Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-6404
Mehran MoghimianDepartment of Urology, Hasheminjad kidney Center, school of Medicine, Iran university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6252-0541
Sina SamenezhadUrology Department, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6125-471X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Importance: Radical cystectomy requires urinary diversion. Although the ileal conduit is the standard approach, it may be contraindicated in certain patients due to prior abdominal surgery, radiation, bowel disease, or anatomical limitations. In such situations, alternative bowel segments, such as the cecum and appendix, may provide a viable option. Evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of cecum-appendix urinary diversion remains limited. Case Presentation: This retrospective case series includes 10 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with cecum-appendix urinary diversion between January and July 2025. The mean age was 69 years, and most patients had significant comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease. Operative time ranged from 80 to 110 minutes. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in most cases, with bowel function returning within 24-48 hours and a mean hospital stay of 4 days. Clinical Discussion: No major complications such as ureteroenteric leaks, strictures, parastomal hernias, metabolic disturbances, or urinary tract infections were observed during short-term follow-up. Renal function and electrolyte balance remained stable. All patients reported satisfactory urinary drainage without stomal dysfunction. These findings suggest that cecum-appendix diversion may reduce bowel manipulation and operative complexity in selected patients when ileal diversion is unsuitable. Conclusion: Cecum-appendix urinary diversion following radical cystectomy appears to be a safe and feasible short-term alternative in carefully selected patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to evaluate long-term functional, metabolic, and oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

bladder neoplasmscase seriescecum–appendixcystectomyshort-term outcomeurinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID41837072
PMCPMC12981889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.