ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Short-term outcomes and surgical technique of cecum and appendix-based urinary diversion in radical cystectomy patients: a case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Importance: Radical cystectomy requires urinary diversion. Although the ileal conduit is the standard approach, it may be contraindicated in certain patients due to prior abdominal surgery, radiation, bowel disease, or anatomical limitations. In such situations, alternative bowel segments, such as the cecum and appendix, may provide a viable option. Evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of cecum-appendix urinary diversion remains limited. Case Presentation: This retrospective case series includes 10 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with cecum-appendix urinary diversion between January and July 2025. The mean age was 69 years, and most patients had significant comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease. Operative time ranged from 80 to 110 minutes. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in most cases, with bowel function returning within 24-48 hours and a mean hospital stay of 4 days. Clinical Discussion: No major complications such as ureteroenteric leaks, strictures, parastomal hernias, metabolic disturbances, or urinary tract infections were observed during short-term follow-up. Renal function and electrolyte balance remained stable. All patients reported satisfactory urinary drainage without stomal dysfunction. These findings suggest that cecum-appendix diversion may reduce bowel manipulation and operative complexity in selected patients when ileal diversion is unsuitable. Conclusion: Cecum-appendix urinary diversion following radical cystectomy appears to be a safe and feasible short-term alternative in carefully selected patients. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to evaluate long-term functional, metabolic, and oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.