ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Suspected anal malignancy turned out to be sarcoidosis; a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Sarcoidosis rarely presents in the anorectal region. It most commonly affects the lungs, lymphatic system, eyes, and skin, but can occur in other organs. Anal or rectal manifestations are exceptionally uncommon and may mimic malignancy both clinically and radiologically, posing a diagnostic challenge. Case presentation: A 66-year-old patient presented to the primary health center with a 9-month history of a mass in the anal region. The patient was referred to the surgical department for further evaluation. Clinical examination and radiological imaging suggested a malignant process. Repeated biopsies were performed, and histopathological analysis ultimately confirmed sarcoidosis. Clinical discussion: The case illustrates how anorectal sarcoidosis can closely resemble malignancy in both presentation and radiological appearance. Initial management with corticosteroid therapy led to regression of the lesion. Given the rarity of this localization and its mimicry of cancer, vigilant follow-up is essential. Imaging and a low threshold for repeat biopsy are crucial, especially if the lesion shows signs of regrowth or insufficient response to treatment. Conclusion: Anorectal sarcoidosis is extremely rare and can be mistaken for malignancy. Accurate diagnosis relies on histopathology from repeated biopsies when imaging and clinical findings are inconclusive. Corticosteroids may be effective, but individualized monitoring with renewed imaging and prompt re-biopsy is recommended to detect recurrence or alternative diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.