ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Coexistant Meckel's diverticulum and patent urachus: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Clinical Importance: Concurrent remnants of the omphalomesenteric duct and urachus are exceptionally found. Diagnosis of Meckel's diverticulum is mainly incidental, but a patent urachus is usually clinically possible. Case Presentation: We admitted a 48-hour-old female patient for an eviscerated Meckel's diverticulum with a history of urine smelling around the umbilicus. Preoperative ultrasound did not identify an associated urachal anomaly. During emergency surgical exploration, a patent urachus was identified. Both remnants were resected, with the Meckel's diverticulum presenting gastric heterotopia. The postoperative course was unremarkable after a 2-year follow-up. Clinical discussion: An asymptomatic Meckel's diverticulum is usually an incidental finding. In this patient, umbilical cord rupture due to a patent urachus eased the diagnosis. As ultrasound is operator dependent, its negation for associated urachal remnant must still indicate meticulous intraoperative exploration to definitively rule out concurrent urachal remnant when its association with an omphalomesenteric duct remnant is suspected. Conclusion: Association between Meckel's diverticulum and patent urachus is rare, but possible. Identification of both anomalies is crucial for comprehensive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.