Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41837014›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

Myopericytoma of the dorsum of the foot: a case report.

Lavanya Sanmugathas, Rasakesary Rushan, Vinothika Sivamayooran, Sriluxyaini Mayoorathan, Vinojan Satchithanantham

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lavanya SanmugathasDepartment of Surgery, Base Hospital Chavakacheri, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Rasakesary RushanDepartment of Surgery, Teaching Hospital, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Vinothika SivamayooranDepartment of Pathology, Teaching Hospital, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Sriluxyaini MayoorathanDepartment of Radiology, Teaching Hospital, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
Vinojan SatchithananthamDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7172-997X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Myopericytoma is a rare, typically benign perivascular soft tissue tumor arising from myopericytes. It most commonly affects the extremities and can recur locally after excision. Presentation of case: We report the case of a 42-year-old male who presented with painful, multiple subcutaneous nodules over the right lateral foot and dorsum, gradually increasing over a 2-year period. The patient had undergone surgical excision of similar lesions from the same site 3 years prior. Clinical examination revealed firm, subcutaneous nodules with a positive Tinel's sign. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed T2 hyperintense lesions with homogeneous post-contrast enhancement, suggestive of a vascular soft tissue tumor. Surgical excision was performed due to persistent pain and functional impairment. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of myopericytoma. Clinical discussion: Myopericytomas are rare, benign soft tissue tumors originating from perivascular myoid cells known as myopericytes. They most commonly arise in the lower extremities, followed by the upper extremities, and are often located in the subcutaneous plane. These tumors are typically small, usually measuring less than 2 cm, and are often multiple. While most myopericytomas are painless, the intravascular variants may present with pain, as in our case. Imaging plays a critical role in the evaluation of myopericytomas. Ultrasound may demonstrate a well-defined, hypoechoic mass with vascularity, while MRI typically shows T2 hyperintensity and homogeneous enhancement following contrast administration. Although myopericytomas are histologically benign, local recurrence can occur, particularly in cases of incomplete excision. Therefore, complete surgical excision with clear margins is the treatment of choice. Conclusion: This case highlights the potential for recurrence of myopericytoma, especially when incompletely excised. Imaging findings, particularly T2 hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement, aid in preoperative suspicion. Complete surgical excision remains the cornerstone of treatment.

Indexed as

case reportmyopericytomasoft tissue tumorTinel’s signvascular tumor

Identifiers

PMID41837014
PMCPMC12981852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.