ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Retained fetal bones after second-trimester dilation and curettage (D&C): report of two cases and review of literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retained fetal bones are a rare complication following second-trimester dilation and curettage (D&C). This condition can lead to chronic endometrial inflammation and secondary infertility, often presenting years later. Missed diagnoses are especially common in low-resource settings due to limited follow-up and diagnostic capacity. Presentation of cases: We present two cases of women with histories of second-trimester pregnancy loss managed with D&C, later diagnosed with retained intrauterine fetal bones. Discussion: Retained fetal bones act as intrauterine foreign bodies, causing secondary infertility through mechanical obstruction, chronic inflammation, and impaired endometrial receptivity. Delayed diagnosis is common due to nonspecific symptoms and limited access to imaging. These cases highlight systemic gaps in post-abortion care, including inadequate follow-up and provider awareness. Conclusion: These cases highlight the need to consider retained fetal bones in women with unexplained infertility and a prior history of second-trimester abortion. Routine post-procedure imaging and structured follow-up protocols are crucial for timely diagnosis and management, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.