ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Incidental finding of a sewing needle in the buttock of a woman with cervical cancer: how did we manage it?
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Foreign bodies such as needles left inside the human body have the potential of complications such as infection, injury to adjacent tissues, increased treatment costs, and repetitive surgeries. Early detection and prompt retrieval with an appropriate technique is crucial to avert these complications. Case presentation: A 53-year-old woman with cervical cancer, FIGO stage IIA, was incidentally found to have an asymptomatic sewing needle in her right buttock for an unknown duration. It was successfully removed under local anesthesia. Discussion: Early detection and prompt retrieval of metallic foreign body is crucial to avert potential complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with metallic foreign body Conclusion: This case report highlights the importance of alarm signal detected during the MRI, irrespective of the history of metallic foreign body present in a human being. In addition, intraoperative X-ray can be useful adjunct tool to ensure complete removal of metallic foreign body parts, so that the patients do not need repetitive surgeries to remove the residual part.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.