ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Artificial intelligence algorithm to predict the requirement of neonatal endotracheal intubation within 3 h: application for clinical practice.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Timely intervention, such as endotracheal intubation (EI), is crucial for managing acute respiratory distress in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Delays in EI can lead to significant adverse effects in neonates. This study aimed to develop a highly accurate predictive model to forecast the requirement for EI, allowing for proactive clinical planning and intervention up to 3 h in advance. Method: We developed a multimodal deep learning model designed to simultaneously analyze distinct data types. The model utilizes numeric initial clinical data and time-series vital sign data collected over the preceding 1-3 h. To rigorously evaluate the model's reliability and clinical applicability, we performed comprehensive external validation using independent patient datasets, specifically assessing generalization and bias. Result: The constrained model successfully predicted the requirement for EI with high predictive power across various forecasting intervals (up to 72 h in 1-h increments). Internal validation yielded an accuracy of 0.9579 and AUC of 0.9323, while external validation maintained high generalization (accuracy 0.9411, AUC 0.9336). Discussion: The proposed multimodal deep learning model provides an effective tool for the advance prediction of EI requirements in neonates. Given its high accuracy, confirmed generalization capabilities through external validation, and potential to prevent severe respiratory distress problems by facilitating proactive care, this model holds wide and significant applicability in clinical NICU environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.