ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Reporting of the harms from randomized controlled trials for psoriasis: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Analysis of adverse events (AEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to psoriasis. Design: A cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study. Data sources: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane Database for studies meeting our eligibility criteria from January 2020 to July 2025. Eligibility criteria: RCTs specifically investigating non-articular psoriasis were included. All long-term extension (LTE) studies were excluded; however, psoriasis-related RCTs utilizing both double-blind and open-label designs were incorporated. Main outcome measures: We assessed (1) general characteristics of psoriasis RCTs; (2) the Adverse Event Reporting Completeness Index (AERCI) Score for reporting completeness; (3) specific details of AEs; (4) factors associated with reporting completeness. Results: A total of 187 psoriasis RCTs published between 2020 and 2025 were included. The median AERCI-Core score was 6.00 (IQR: 2.00-8.00), indicating suboptimal overall reporting quality, with only 26.2% of studies rated as high quality. Adherence to individual reporting items varied widely, with particularly low rates observed for AE management measures (16.0%), timing of AE onset (20.3%), outcome/resolution (26.7%), and use of standardized coding systems (31.6%). Multivariable linear regression identified journal impact factor [β = 0.27, 95% CI (0.13, 0.40), Conclusions: This study identified inadequate reporting of adverse events in RCTs for non-articular psoriasis. After adjusting for confounding variables, a higher journal impact factor and a focus on pustular psoriasis were positively associated with the complete reporting of AEs. To enhance the utility of safety data for clinical decision-making, future trials should rigorously implement the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Harms 2022 (CONSORT-Harms 2022) recommendations, thereby providing patients with more balanced information on the benefits and harms of psoriasis therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.