ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a real-world clinical study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Effect of switching from entecavir to tenofovir amibufenamide on HBsAg levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a 96-week real-world study].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to generate evidence to inform optimization of antiviral treatment selection in routine clinical practice. Methods: This study enrolled 186 patients with CHB, of whom 93 received TMF and 93 received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the virological response rate. Secondary endpoints included the rate of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization; changes in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) levels; and changes in renal and bone metabolism markers, including serum creatinine, uric acid, calcium, and phosphate. Results: After 48 weeks of treatment, virological response rates did not differ significantly between the TMF and TDF groups ( Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, TMF is an effective treatment for CHB. Compared with TDF, TMF is associated with superior ALT normalization and higher HBeAg seroconversion rates, along with a more favorable renal safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.