ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Effect of deep analgosedation vs. intubated general anesthesia on perioperative sedation-related adverse events in older adults undergoing ERCP: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07017283 (Effect of Deep Analgosedation vs. Endotracheal Intubation General Anesthesia on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Elderly ERCP Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Deep Analgosedation vs. Endotracheal Intubation General Anesthesia on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Elderly ERCP Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep analgosedation (DAS) and general anesthesia (GA) are currently the predominant anesthetic approaches for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In contrast to DAS, GA typically requires endotracheal intubation for airway management. To determine the optimal analgosedation strategy, this study is designed to compare the effect of nasopharyngeal airway-assisted DAS (NPA-assisted DAS) vs. endotracheal intubation GA on perioperative sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) in elderly ERCP patients. Methods: Patients scheduled for ERCP will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to NPA-assisted DAS or endotracheal intubation GA. Randomization will be stratified by study center and hypertension status, using permuted blocks of sizes 2 and 4. The major exclusion criterion is severe cardiopulmonary disease. The primary outcome is a composite of SRAEs, including hypoxemia, hypotension, hypertension, laryngospasm, or bronchospasm. Secondary outcomes include escalation of respiratory support, tachycardia, bradycardia, reflux, recovery time, postoperative recovery quality (QoR-15), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), cognitive function, perioperative respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), patient and endoscopist satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. All analyses will follow a modified intention-to-treat approach. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (2025-0780). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: Clinical Trial Registry (NCT07017283).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.