Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836877›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Critical Care Nurses' Experiences with Endotracheal Suctioning in Critically Ill Older Adults Patients: A Phenomenological Study.

Jun Tang, Jing Lyv, Ni-Hui Wu, Xu Chen, Jiao-Jiao Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun Tang *Department of Nursing, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Jing Lyv *Department of Geriatric Critical Care Unit, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Ni-Hui WuDepartment of Geriatric Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Xu ChenDepartment of Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Jiao-Jiao BaiDepartment of Nursing, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences with endotracheal suctioning in critically ill older adults and to generate evidence to support the development of targeted standardized protocols. Methods: A phenomenological approach was applied to conduct in-depth interviews with 15 nurses at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from February to March 2025. Participants met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's method. Results: Three themes were identified: the unique characteristics of endotracheal suctioning in critically ill older adults; challenges encountered during suctioning and corresponding coping strategies; and nurses' needs and recommendations for establishing standardized protocols. Conclusion: The results of this study underscore the necessity of establishing age-specific suction parameters (such as pressure and depth) and individualized operational procedures tailored to comorbidities (such as coagulopathy), providing crucial evidence for the development of standardized protocols focused on airway fragility and complication prevention in elderly patients.

Indexed as

critical ill patientsendotracheal suctioningexperiencenurseolder adultsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41836877
PMCPMC12982149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.