ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)
Pregnancy outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pregnancy.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the relationship between juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and pregnancy outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted by searching for published articles indexed in Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception through January 2025. All observational studies that compared the risk of any pregnancy outcomes of women with and without JIA were identified. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: A total of 196 articles were identified, and 11 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. For maternal outcomes and delivery outcomes of pregnant JIA women, there was an increased risk of developing preeclampsia/eclampsia (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07-2.22; I Conclusion: JIA is associated with higher risks of preeclampsia, undergoing cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.