ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)
Disparities in access to dermatological care in Texas counties and their implications on public health.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Underserved: the specialist shortage in rural Texas.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rural communities face challenges of insufficient healthcare professionals. Studies show that rural populations experience disparities in skin cancer care and delayed diagnoses. Methods: Data describing Texas dermatologist locations from 2015 to 2022 were obtained from the Texas Department of Health Services. County-level data, including estimated population, rural-urban continuum codes, public health regions, and poverty percent, were collected from the Texas Department of Health Services, the Economic Research Service at the US Department of Agriculture, and the US Census Bureau. Results: Only 2 public health regions met the recommended ratio of 4 dermatologists per 100,000 people in 2022. While dermatologist density has increased with a compound annual growth rate of 2.47%, rural areas with <5000 people showed a negative compound annual growth rate of -9.12%. Dermatologist density in public health regions surrounding the largest cities in Texas-San Antonio, Houston, Austin, and Dallas-was 4.01 per 100,000 dermatologists in 2022, which was significantly higher than the rest of Texas at 1.86 ( Conclusions: These findings highlight insufficient access to Texas dermatologists and describe disparities linked to population, poverty, and urban proximity. Efforts are needed to address these inequalities and their consequences on dermatologic outcomes in rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.