ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Clinical diagnostic value of the plasma heparin binding protein in diabetic nephropathy patients comorbid with sepsis.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical diagnostic value of plasma heparin binding protein in diabetes nephropathy (DN) with sepsis. Methodology: The study was a retrospective study of 82 patients with DN, carried out in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from April 2024 to December 2024. Information about inflammatory indicators, biochemical, glucose metabolism and urine microalbumin indicators. Patients were divided into two major groups, DN sepsis group (n=42) and DN group (n=40). Date of 40 T2DM patients were used as the normal control group. The inter group comparison was conducted using analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between HBP and BUN, Scr, UACR, and eGFR, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of inflammatory indicators, and to evaluate their diagnostic efficiency for DN patients with sepsis. Results: Compared with DN and T2DM groups, HBP, CRP and PCT were dramatically increased in DN sepsis group (p<0.001), ESR and NE% also higher (p<0.05). In DN group, HBP exhibited an upward trend (p<0.05) than T2DM group. The serum HBP was positively correlated with BUN, Scr and UACR, negatively correlated with eGFR in DN patients. In the early stage of sepsis in DN patients, the area under the curve (AUC) of HBP is 0.691. Conclusion: The plasma HBP were dramatically increased in DN patients comorbid with sepsis, plasma HBP clinical testing were essential and had high-efficiency clinical diagnosis abilities of sepsis in DN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.