Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836810›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026

Real-time polymerase chain reaction results of urogenital system samples and their relationship with other sexually transmitted diseases.

Emel Caliskan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emel CaliskanEmel Caliskan, MD Associate Professor Duzce University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Duzce, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the results obtained by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for microorganisms in urogenital tract samples sent to the molecular microbiology laboratory than patients of sexually transmitted infections suspected. In addition, we evaluated them alongside HIV, HBV, HCV, and syphilis test results. Method: Urine, vaginal swab, and urethral discharge samples submitted to Duzce University, Medical Microbiology Laboratory between March 2023 to November 2023 were included in the cross-sectional study. Multiplex PCR was used to assess the positivity of Results: A total of one hundred patient samples were sent to the Molecular Microbiology Laboratory during the study period. Twenty-eight patients were female and 72 were male, and the mean age was 34.11±10.63 (19-72). A total of 109 positive pathogens were detected in 65 (65%) patients. The positivity rate in women was 75% and in men was 62%, and was statistically similar (p=0.191). The most common pathogen detected in women was Conclusion: Molecular microbiological methods may be useful in patients suspected of having a urogenital system infection when no pathogens are cultured or when the presence of multiple pathogens must be identified to guide treatment.

Indexed as

Polymerase chain reactionSexually transmitted infectionsUrogenital system infection

Identifiers

PMID41836810
PMCPMC12980264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.