ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Performance comparison of conductive textile electrodes in ECG monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commercial Metallized Textiles for Dry EEG Electrodes: Structure, Textile-Level Durability, and Controlled Frontal Validation Against Ag/AgCl.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of textile electrodes offers the possibility of improving comfort and reducing the risk of allergic reactions of the measured subject, while also opening the door to non-medical devices for everyday life. The main objective of the experiment is to test and compare five conductive fabrics manufactured by Shieldex in terms of the quality of the measured electrocardiography (ECG) signals. For this experiment, 3 electrodes of each conductive material were made and tested on a sample of 20 volunteers. The electrodes were attached by an elastic band at the locations of selected standardized ECG leads, and Ag/AgCl electrodes were used as reference. Correlation coefficient (R), signal-to-noice ratio (SNR) and percentage root-mean-square deviation (PRD) applied to representative cardiac periods were used to evaluate the quality of the acquired data. Differences in the results of the evaluation parameters between the different positions were noted, and when the distribution of positions was neglected, it was discovered that the best results were obtained with Shieldex Silitex material and, on the contrary, the worst results were recorded with Shieldex Technik-tex P130 + B material. It was also found that the results were not significant between the materials and after visual inspection it can be concluded that all materials are suitable for ECG measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.