Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836742›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2026

Exploring occupational therapists' perceptions, current practices and confidence levels in supporting return to work after stroke: A mixed-methods study.

Paula Reddan, Deirdre Connolly, Louise Keating

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula ReddanCity St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-3627
Deirdre ConnollySchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Louise KeatingSchool of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 100,000 people in the United Kingdom experience a stroke each year, with one in four being of working age. One-third do not return to work. Occupational therapists support stroke survivors return to work, but specific practices are unclear. This study aimed to explore occupational therapists' perceptions, current practices and confidence levels when working with people with stroke who wish to return to work. Methods: A mixed-methods study was completed. A survey explored occupational therapy practices and confidence levels. A focus group explored the experience and perceptions of occupational therapists. Participants were occupational therapists in the United Kingdom working with individuals with stroke for a minimum of 6 months. Results: Sixty-eight respondents completed the survey. There were four focus group participants. Traditional stroke rehabilitation assessments and interventions were reported more frequently than work-related interventions. Participants reported being less confident liaising with employers and identified lack of resources, training and flexibility in delivery of stroke services as challenging. Conclusion: This study suggests that current occupational therapy practice does not consistently provide work-specific interventions. Flexibility in services is needed to address the vocational rehabilitation needs of stroke survivors with recommendations for post-graduate training and specialist roles in stroke-related vocational rehabilitation.

Indexed as

assessment and interventionconfidence levelsOccupational therapyperceptionsreturn to workstroke

Identifiers

PMID41836742
PMCPMC12982834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.