ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Are Maternal and Neonatal Death Reviews a Feasible Approach to Study Gaps in Care: Findings from a Case Study.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality is a global priority, yet the processes for retrieving and using death review data remain unclear. This study examined the practicality of collecting and applying maternal and neonatal death review information to assess care quality and identify gaps. We conducted a mixed-methods study in two districts in India (District A in Telangana and District B in Gujarat), reviewing records of 10 maternal and 10 neonatal deaths that occurred between April 2020 and March 2021. Data were extracted to assess completeness, and field notes documented operational challenges. Retrieving records was difficult due to fragmented storage, unclear responsibilities, and the need for multiple permissions and repeated visits. Reluctance among officials to share data further delayed access. Most review forms lacked sufficient detail to evaluate quality of care or determine preventability. Maternal deaths mainly involved young women aged 15-24 and occurred within 24 hours postpartum, often linked to delays in receiving appropriate care. Neonatal deaths frequently involved low-birthweight or preterm infants and were attributed to asphyxia or infection. Overall, operational barriers and incomplete documentation limit the usefulness of maternal and neonatal death reviews. Strengthening record management, data-sharing, and documentation practices is essential for improving care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.