SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Effectiveness of exercise interventions on gross motor skills in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of different exercise interventions on gross motor skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and to compare the effects of different exercise types and intervention dosages through subgroup analysis. Methods: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) investigating the effects of exercise interventions on gross motor skills in children with ASD across PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases from their inception until September 20, 2025. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software with a random-effects model, and effect sizes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 16 studies involving 493 children with ASD were included. Meta-analysis results indicated that exercise interventions significantly improved balance skills (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI [0.54, 1.16]), locomotor skills (SMD = 0.81, 95% CI [0.51, 1.11]), and object control skills (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI [0.65, 1.07]) in children with ASD, with all effect sizes being large (all P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis showed that Land-based sports significantly improved all three skill domains (all P < 0.00001), whereas Aquatic sports and technically-assisted sports mostly failed to reach statistical significance. Regarding intervention dosage, medium-duration programs (total duration ≤1440 minutes) significantly improved all three skill domains (all P < 0.0001), while high-duration programs (>1440 minutes) only showed a significant effect on object control skills (SMD = 0.75, P = 0.003). Conclusion: Exercise interventions, particularly structured Land-based sports, are effective methods for improving gross motor skills in children with ASD. A medium-dosage regimen with a total intervention duration of ≤1440 minutes (approximately 8-12 weeks) appears to be the key window for optimal benefits. Prioritizing this regimen in clinical rehabilitation and educational practice is recommended. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251185572.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.