ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Calm after the storm? Clinical phenotypes and risk markers in suicidal patients: data from a liaison-consultation psychiatric setting.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Suicidality represents an increasing public health matter and is more frequently associated with higher psychiatric vulnerability and with greater severity of psychopathological manifestations. Suicide risk may arise from a complex interplay of socio-environmental and clinical factors, which can be promptly explored during psychiatric consultations following a suicide attempt (SA). The present study aims at clarifying the correlates of suicidality in a liaison-consultation setting, in order to characterize risk profiles that could be targeted by preventive strategies. Methods: The present analysis is based on data collected from psychiatric consultations conducted in medical settings at the University Hospital of Perugia. We used the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale for the assessment of suicidal ideation (SI), SA, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Study participants were divided in those referred after a SA (SA group) and those referred for other psychiatric reasons (non-SA group), including SI and NSSI. Bivariate analyses were performed to assess significant differences between the groups and a logistic regression model using Firth's penalized likelihood was created to evaluate the correlates of suicidality in our sample. Results: In our sample (N = 373, 61.1% females, mean age 47.99 ± 21.09 years), 129 patients (34.6%) were evaluated after a real, interrupted, or aborted SA. Patients in the SA subgroup were more frequently females (p=0.031) and younger (p<0.001), also reporting a higher prevalence of familiar psychiatric history (p=0.011), previous SA (p<0.001) and NSSI (p<0.001), life stressors in the past six months (p=0.044), and current DSM-5-TR diagnosis of depressive (p=0.028) and personality disorders (p<0.001). At the logistic regression model (p<0.001), the variables that resulted to be positively associated with SA were previous NSSI (OR = 5.92), previous SA (OR = 3.09), a diagnosis of depressive (OR = 2.65) personality disorder according to DSM-5-TR (OR = 2.36), life stressors during the past six months (OR = 1.88), whereas age was negatively associated with SA (OR = 0.97). Conclusions: Our findings underline the high prevalence of suicidality in liaison-consultation psychiatry and confirm that psychiatric consultation in the general hospital represents a crucial opportunity for comprehensive assessment of risk factors and early intervention. Younger individuals with a history of suicidal behaviors and NSSI should be considered a high-risk group and prioritized for targeted preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.