ArticleDigital health
Using text mining to identify and prioritize user needs for digital mental health services on Chinese online platforms.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify user needs on digital mental health platforms through text mining to guide service optimization. Methods: User comments collected over 6 months via Python-based web scraping (ethically reviewed) underwent data cleaning, word segmentation, and stop-word removal. Latent topics were extracted using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), with sentiment and semantic network analyses via ROST Content Mining System (Version 6.0). A need-intensity formula integrated with LDA enabled quantitative analysis of user needs and emotional tendencies. Results: From 25,131 valid user comments, six main topics were identified. Topic prevalence, measured by comment volume, was highest for "Career and Personal Growth" (20.40%) and "Social and Emotional Support" (20.15%). Sentiment analysis showed over 77% of comments expressed negative emotions, with each topic exceeding 96% negative sentiment. We then calculated a composite need-intensity score (via LDA integration and Analytic Hierarchy Process weighting: comment count 0.54, sentiment 0.16, user attention 0.30) to prioritize beyond mere prevalence. This analysis identified "Career and Personal Growth" (0.94) and "Social and Emotional Support" (0.88) as the most pressing needs. Conclusions: Users exhibit pronounced needs in emotion management and psychological counseling, with a strong emphasis on familial and social support. To address the most urgent needs identified by our need-intensity analysis, we recommend that platforms implement targeted features such as a structured career stress triage pathway and secure family linkage options. These actionable strategies can enhance service precision and user engagement, providing a clear roadmap for optimizing digital mental health service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.