ReviewCancer management and research2026
Research Status of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a common malignant tumor. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) drugs are widely used in the treatment of PC, to date, clinical research on ADT drugs has not provided a clear overview of the existing treatment regimens. The purpose of this study is to use scoring review to sort out relevant research, present relevant research evidence, and identify recommended guidance for selecting therapeutic strategies. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for literature published until September 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted on the main characteristics of the included studies, with a primary focus on changes in the medication regimens of the four ADT drugs identified in clinical studies. Results: Ultimately, 160 literatures with 126 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the analysis. There were 52, 67, ten, and 16 studies evaluating leuprorelin, goserelin, triptorelin, and degarelix, respectively. The main medication regimens for ADT drugs included monotherapy and combination therapy with first generation anti-androgen drugs, novel hormonal drugs, and other treatments. In RCTs that evaluated leuprorelin and goserelin, numerous studies involved all four medication regimens. However, due to the relatively late regulatory approval of triptorelin and degarelix, these were mainly studied as monotherapy. There were only six studies from China. Conclusion: Although numerous studies have evaluated the efficacy of ADT drugs for the treatment of PC, there is still a paucity of high-quality research across multiple domains. Furthermore, there is a relative lack of in-depth research involving Chinese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.