Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Fosaprepitant versus Ondansetron for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05881486 (The Effects of Intravenous Fosaprepitant and Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Thoracicsurgery Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effects of Intravenous Fosaprepitant and Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Thoracicsurgery Patients: A Single-center, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent complication after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection, particularly in patients at moderate to high risk, and substantially hinders recovery. Fosaprepitant, a neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist, is approved for PONV prevention; however, its efficacy in video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection remains uncertain. This randomized trial evaluated the efficacy of fosaprepitant versus ondansetron in preventing PONV in high-risk patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection. Patients and Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, 233 adults aged 18-70 years undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with an Apfel score ≥ 2 were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous fosaprepitant 150 mg or ondansetron 8 mg, each combined with dexamethasone 5 mg. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of PONV at 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively, the use of rescue antiemetics, adverse events, and recovery outcomes. Results: The 24-hour incidence of PONV was 31.0% [36] in the fosaprepitant group and 41.0% [48] in the ondansetron group (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.07; Conclusion: Fosaprepitant was superior to ondansetron in preventing early postoperative vomiting and delayed-phase PONV, and it represents an effective antiemetic strategy for high-risk thoracic surgical patients. Trial Number and Registry Url: Registration number, NCT05881486; https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.