Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836492›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2026

Serum CEA, CA19-9, and AFP as biomarkers for gastric cancer.

Zhonghua Wu, Fanyong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhonghua WuJiashan County First People's Hospital, Department of Proctology, Jiaxing, China.
Fanyong ZhangJiashan County First People's Hospital, Department of Proctology, Jiaxing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic value of AFP CA19-9 and CEA as biomarkers in gastric carcinoma remains uncertain. This research explores their role in forecasting patient survival and disease progression. Methods: A total of 630 early-stage gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2018 and June 2024 were analysed. Pathological evaluations were conducted, and serum concentrations of CEA, CA19-9, and AFP were measured. Statistical methods were employed to evaluate the relationship between these markers, tumour characteristics, and their impact on prognosis. Results: The mean age of patients was 59 years. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 98.3% and 91.4%, respectively. The positivity rates for CEA, CA19-9, and AFP were 5.1%, 6.2%, and 2.3%, respectively, resulting in an overall detection rate of 12.4%. The mean serum concentration of CEA was 4.8 ng/mL, the median concentration of CA19-9 was 45.2 U/mL, and the concentration range of AFP was from 3.5 ng/mL to 12.7 ng/mL. Elevated levels of CEA and CA19-9 were associated with metastasis of lymph nodes and higher tumour stages, while AFP showed no meaningful association with disease characteristics. Multivariate analysis identified age over 65, lymph node metastasis, and high CEA levels as independent risk factors for poorer outcomes in gastric cancer. Conclusions: Although CEA, CA19-9, and AFP individually show low detection rates in gastric cancer, their combined use improves diagnostic accuracy. Elevated CA19-9 is associated with lymph node metastasis, and high CEA independently indicates a poorer prognosis. Additional research is necessary to clarify the clinical utility of these biomarkers in early detection and prognostic evaluation.

Indexed as

AFP CA19-9CEAclinical significancegastric cancersurvival analysistumour markers

Identifiers

PMID41836492
PMCPMC12980156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.