Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836479›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

Detecting statistical interactions in immune receptor data: a comparative study.

Thomas Minotto, Ingrid Hobæk Haff, Enrico Riccardi, Geir K Sandve

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas MinottoDepartment of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Hobæk HaffDepartment of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Enrico RiccardiDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir K SandveDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical interactions are part of numerous data generating processes and several methods have been developed to detect them. We here study immune receptors binding to antigens, where advanced machine learning techniques have proved useful for binding prediction, suggesting significant intra amino acid chain interactions. We reviewed detection methods based on logistic lasso, logic regression, random forests and neural networks. We compared detection performance in simulated immune data, and how it is affected by the order of interactions, their strength related to the main effects, their frequency of occurrence and the size of the data. Interactions were implanted as motifs of amino acids that determined the binding status of sequences through a logistic regression model. Results show that pairwise interactions were retrieved from just 1000 sequences in the dataset, and optimal detection happened for an implantation rate of around 20 percent. For higher-order interactions, the best performance was obtained by logic regression and random forest based methods. The running time for the neural network-based method was several orders of magnitude lower, followed by the lasso-based methods. We applied the methods on an experimental dataset and identified several pairwise interactions as well as a three-way interaction, enhancing the accuracy of prediction models.

Indexed as

62J07Antibody-antigen bindinginteraction detectionlogic regressionlogistic regressionmachine learningrandom forests

Identifiers

PMID41836479
PMCPMC12981274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.