Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836347›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

En-Bloc Stapler versus Clips for Hilar Vascular Control in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy.

Abdullah Golbasi, Burak Elmaagac, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Huseyin Bicer, Berk Cilek, Murat Keske, Mert Ali Karadag

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdullah GolbasiDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Golbasi, Elmaagac, and Karadag).
Burak ElmaagacDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Golbasi, Elmaagac, and Karadag).
Ali Yasin OzercanDepartment of Urology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Ozercan, Bicer, and Cilek).
Huseyin BicerDepartment of Urology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Ozercan, Bicer, and Cilek).
Berk CilekDepartment of Urology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Ozercan, Bicer, and Cilek).
Murat KeskeKayseri Memorial Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Dr. Keske).
Mert Ali KaradagDepartment of Urology, University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Golbasi, Elmaagac, and Karadag).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is widely preferred for its advantages over open surgery, and secure hilar control is a critical procedural step. Although both clips and staplers are commonly used, studies comparing these techniques outside the setting of donor nephrectomy remain limited. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of en-bloc stapler ligation versus separate arterial and venous clipping. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged 18-80 who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between 2020 and 2025. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected, and complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Hilar control was performed either by en-bloc stapling or separate clipping. Statistical analyses included comparative tests and logistic regression, with significance set at Results: A total of 171 patients were analyzed (80 EndoGIA, 91 clip). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Operative time (122 vs 135 minutes; Conclusion: Both en-bloc stapler ligation and separate clipping are safe methods for hilar control in laparoscopic nephrectomy. En-bloc stapling may reduce operative time and associated complications, offering particular advantages in complex dissections or when minimizing surgery duration is critical, thereby supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyNephrectomySurgical InstrumentsSurgical StaplersSurgical StaplingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLigationMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyNephrectomyRenal arteryRenal veins

Identifiers

PMID41836347
PMCPMC12981366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.