Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836329›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2026

Successful single-center experiences of laser crossectomy in zone zero in Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) for chronic venous insufficiency - a case series.

Taofan Taofan, Suko Ardiarto, Suci Indriani, Ruth Grace Aurora, Adelin Dhivi, Aris Munandar, Vekky Sariowan, Erwin Mulia, Fadhil Pratama, Rido Jati Kuncara and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Taofan TaofanDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-9010
Suko ArdiartoDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2848-0566
Suci IndrianiDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-0390
Ruth Grace AuroraDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Adelin DhiviDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Aris MunandarCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Vekky SariowanCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Erwin MuliaCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Fadhil PratamaCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rido Jati KuncaraCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Yuyun PamungkasNational Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kelvin KoharAssistant Researcher, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4789-0747
Matthew SebastianAssistant Researcher, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8001-9054
Aditya RachmanCardiologist Fellow/Resident in Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Eric FerdinandAssistant Researcher, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Junichi UtohDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Kumamoto Kekkan Vascular Clinic, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-833X
Marc VuylstekeDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Sint-Andriesziekenhuis Tielt, Tielt, Belgium.
Thomas WeilerDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Venenzentrum Pforzheim, Pforzheim, 75179, Germany.
Iwan DakotaDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5360-2759
Bambang WidyantoroDepartment of Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5325-4125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a prevalent and underdiagnosed disease affecting over 25 million adults worldwide. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) remains the gold standard for great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency. However, conventional EVLA performed 1-2 cm distal to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) often leaves residual tributaries, increasing the risk of recurrence. Zone-zero laser crossectomy, defined as laser crossectomy performed exactly at the 0 cm zone of the SFJ (zone-zero ablation), had been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative technique to eliminate residual stumps and reduce varicose vein recurrence. This case series of zone-zero laser crossectomy aims to share our experiences and outcomes amongst 57 patients in our center. Methods: A total of 57 consecutive patients with symptomatic GSV insufficiency (CEAP C2-C6) underwent EVLA using a 1470 nm radial double-ring swift laser with zone-zero ablation at the SFJ. Procedural parameters, complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Patients were followed at 7 days, 4, 8, and 12 weeks with physical and duplex ultrasound examinations. Results: The mean age was 61.6 years. No recanalization was observed during the 3-month follow-up, with duplex ultrasound confirming complete obliteration of treated GSVs. Postoperative complications included leg pain in 3 cases (5.26%), EHIT grade I-II in 1 case (1.75%), hyperpigmentation in 1 case (1.75%), and paresthesia in 1 case (1.75%). All complications were mild and managed conservatively. Conclusions: Zone-zero laser crossectomy is a safe and effective modification of EVLA for GSV insufficiency, demonstrating high obliteration rates and low complication rates. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are needed to confirm durability.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresLaser TherapyVenous InsufficiencyAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaphenous VeinTreatment Outcomechronic venous insufficiencyefficacy Main bodyEndovenous laser ablationlaser crossectomysafetyvaricose vein

Identifiers

PMID41836329
PMCPMC12982993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.