SynthesisFrontiers in aging2026
Non-pharmacological mental health interventions for older adults in Mexico: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The accelerated aging of the Mexican population presents an urgent public health challenge, particularly regarding geriatric mental health. While non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) offer a promising therapeutic avenue, national evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy of NPIs implemented in Mexico to improve mental health outcomes among adults aged 60 and older. Method: Adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251033051), we conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and the Virtual Health Library (2010-2025). We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, assessing risk of bias via Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: Seven studies (N = 267; mean age 71.9 ± 7.3) met the eligibility criteria. Synthesis of findings revealed distinct efficacy patterns: physical exercise interventions yielded the most robust outcomes, demonstrating large effect sizes for reducing depressive symptoms (ηp Discussion and Conclusion: Current evidence confirms that NPIs-specifically structured physical activity-are potent and scalable tools for promoting geriatric mental health in Mexico. However, the existing literature is limited by heterogeneity and a lack of geographic coverage. To bridge the gap between research and practice, it is imperative that policymakers transition from isolated pilot interventions to the integration of standardized, evidence-based NPIs protocols within the national geriatric care system. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251033051, identifier CRD420251033051.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.