ArticleJAMIA open2026
Real-time automated billing for tobacco treatment: performance evaluation of the CigStopper machine learning framework.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate CigStopper, a machine learning algorithm designed to predict billing eligibility for tobacco cessation counseling (CPT 99406/99407), addressing persistent underbilling and documentation gaps in health systems. Materials and Methods: We trained CigStopper on a 40,000-note corpus comprising real-world de-identified clinical notes, synthetically generated notes, and a blended dataset. Notes were categorized by billing eligibility and smoking documentation. Random Forest models were trained and evaluated using both flat multiclass and hierarchical classification approaches. Performance was assessed on a 20% holdout set of real notes using standard metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1). Results: Models trained on real or blended datasets achieved high performance for billing eligibility (F1 ≥ 0.97) and 99406 prediction (F1 ≥ 0.90). Prediction for intensive counseling (99407) remained limited (F1 ≤ 0.56). Synthetic-only training resulted in overfitting, with poor generalization to real-world data. Hierarchical classification improved eligibility detection and CPT code prediction compared with flat multiclass models. Discussion: Findings demonstrate that blended datasets mitigate class imbalance and improve generalizability, while hierarchical architectures enhance performance on billing tasks. Persistent gaps in 99407 prediction were related to low training volume, likely reflecting documentation and coding culture rather than model limitations, underscoring systemic issues in clinical note content. Conclusion: CigStopper demonstrates feasibility as a scalable NLP-based billing validation tool. By automating tobacco cessation CPT coding, the algorithm can improve data integrity, reduce missed reimbursement, and support health systems in aligning clinical care with financial and population health priorities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.