ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2026
Rewriting the epigenome: CRISPR tools for biological discovery and therapeutics.
Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic regulation of metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mechanisms, metabolic crosstalk, and engineering applications.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The eukaryotic epigenome plays a central role in regulating gene expression, cellular identity, and development through dynamic, multilayered biochemical modifications to DNA, histones, and chromatin architecture. Disruption of these regulatory mechanisms contributes to a wide range of human diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and immunological conditions. Targeted epigenome editing offers promising discovery and therapeutic strategies by enabling the correction of aberrant epigenetic states without the need for permanent changes to the DNA sequence. The catalytically inactive CRISPR-Cas (dCas) molecule fused to epigenetic effector domains has emerged as a versatile platform for programmable, locus-specific modulation of chromatin states. These CRISPR-based epigenetic editors can deposit or remove desired epigenetic marks and alter three-dimensional genome organization to fine-tune gene expression with high specificity. Recent developments have expanded the CRISPR epigenome editing toolbox by introducing new effector domains, improving multiplexing capabilities, and enabling large-scale genetic screening, leading to novel insights into the functional genomics across various cellular contexts. However, clinical translation remains challenged by inefficient delivery and suboptimal editing efficacy in vivo. This review highlights recent advances in CRISPR-based epigenetic editing, with a focus on applications in primary cells, new tool development, and the translational potential of epigenome modulation for safe, durable, and precise therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.