ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Portal vein reconstruction reduces textbook outcome achievement following radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) remains a surgically challenging malignancy, often requiring major hepatectomy with vascular resection and reconstruction to achieve R0 resection. Portal vein reconstruction (PVR) enables radical resection in patients with vascular invasion, while its impact on surgical quality, measured using textbook outcome (TO), remains unclear. Methods: A total of 317 HCCA patients who underwent R0 resection at a single tertiary medical center were retrospectively analyzed. In this study, TO was defined as the absence of 90-day mortality, readmission within 90 days, post-operative severe comorbidities, post-operative bile leak, post-operative liver failure, and intraoperative severe incidents. Epidemiological characteristics, pre-operative examination results, intraoperative features, post-operative comorbidities, and survival were compared between the PVR (n = 62) and non-PVR (n = 255) groups. The predictors of TO were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: In this study, 113 of 317 patients (35.65%) achieved TO. TO rates were significantly lower in the PVR group (20.97%) compared with the non-PVR group (39.22%, p = 0.007). Patients with PVR had higher rates of post-operative infection (73.8% Conclusions: PVR is significantly associated with reduced TO achievement and impaired long-term outcomes following R0 resection for HCCA patients. Although PVR remains a necessary approach to achieve curative resection in advanced cases, its impact highlights the need for careful patient selection and optimization of peri-operative management to improve the clinical outcomes of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.