Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836250›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

The length of negative proximal resection margin does not significantly influence on the prognosis of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Zhendan Yao, Maoxing Liu, Fei Tan, Ming Cui, Jiadi Xing, Chenghai Zhang, Hong Yang, Lei Chen, Kai Xu, Xiangqian Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhendan Yao *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Maoxing Liu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Fei Tan *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ming CuiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jiadi XingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Chenghai ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Hong YangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Lei ChenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Kai XuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiangqian SuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department IV of Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal length of proximal resection margin (PRM) for locally advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) remained undetermined. Especially, the relationship between PRM length after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and survival were seldom reported. Methods: A total of 108 consecutive locally advanced Siewert type II AEG patients were enrolled. The clinicopathological characteristics, PRM length and survival outcomes were collected. Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the hazard rates of survival and recurrence between patients with length above and below the cut-off value. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analysis association between PRM length and prognosis. Results: The mean PRM length was 13mm (range: 1-45 mm). PRM status was independent factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 3.177, 95%CI 1.098-9.193, Conclusions: A positive status of PRM appears to be associated with adverse survival outcomes of patients with locally advanced Siewert type II AEG after surgery. However, for patients with negative status, the length of the PRM does not influence survival, regardless of whether they undergo surgical resection alone or NAC followed by surgery.

Indexed as

adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junctionfrozen section analysisneoadjuvant chemotherapyproximal resection marginsurvival

Identifiers

PMID41836250
PMCPMC12979070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.