Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Proton therapy for pancreatic cancer: real-world single-center experience of efficacy, toxicity, and predictors of outcome.

Philipp Lishewski, Zelal Geyik, Linda Agolli, Kerem Tuna Tas, Houmam Anees, Klemens Zink, Fabian Eberle, Anja Rinke, Hilke Vorwerk, Thomas Held and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Philipp LishewskiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Zelal GeyikDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Linda AgolliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Kerem Tuna TasDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Houmam AneesDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Klemens ZinkDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Fabian EberleDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Anja RinkeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt - Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hilke VorwerkDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Thomas HeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel HabermehlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, University Hospital, Giessen, Germany.
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Ahmed GawishDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis, with five-year survival rates of 10-13%. Surgery is the only curative option, though not feasible for many patients. Radiation therapy is crucial but limited by surrounding radiosensitive organs. Proton therapy provides improved dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness; however, clinical data comparing it to conventional photon therapy remains scarce. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 41 patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with curative-intent proton therapy at Marburg Ion Beam Treatment Center. Median patient age was 69.5 years; 58.5% were male, 70.8% had T3/4 tumors, and 73.2% presented at stage III. Median delivered dose was 54.0 GyE (median BED: 64.0 GyE) over 30 fractions. Most (95.1%) received proton therapy alone, 68.3% with concurrent chemotherapy. Outcomes evaluated included overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and CTCAE v5.0-assessed toxicities. Results: Proton therapy showed good tolerability with minimal toxicity (early grade ≥III: 2.4%; late grade III: 4.9%, no late grade IV/V). Local recurrence occurred in 13 patients (all within 6 months), and overall progression was noted in 33 patients (mostly within 1 year). Salvage RT correlated with worse PFS on univariate analysis (p=0.03), though non-significant in Cox regression (p=0.06). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed a non-significant trend toward improved OS (HR = 0.53, p=0.08). No dose-related factors influenced local recurrence. Conclusions: Proton therapy for pancreatic cancer was well tolerated, though outcomes remained modest compared to recent studies utilizing higher doses and optimized protocols. Low toxicity supports proton therapy's theoretical advantages. Dose escalation and protocol optimization may enhance outcomes. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted.

Indexed as

chemoradiationchemotherapyimage guided radiation therapy (IGRT)pancreas cancerproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID41836228
PMCPMC12979228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.