ReviewJournal of cardiovascular and thoracic research2025
Return to work after myocardial infarction: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of people experiencing Myocardial Infarction are of working age, which may result in prolonged work disability. This study seeks to consolidate the available evidence regarding the return to work for individuals following a Myocardial Infarction, while also examining its correlation with disease severity, job engagement, and duration of hospitalization. This research is a systematic review. The databases utilized include MEDLINE, Lilacs, Scielo, and Web of Science, with keywords and synonyms sourced from the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS), Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and Embase Subject Headings (Emtree). Data collection took place between November 2023 and June 2024. The studies' quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. The search yielded 4,695 articles, from which 12 cohort studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a total of 83,702 participants. The rate of return to work fluctuated throughout the follow-up period, with a return rate of 21.5% to 41.7% after one month and between 76.9% and 92.7% after one year. Additionally, the studies reported on modifications in work roles, salary reductions, job dismissals, and the incidence of anxiety and depression. All cohort studies were deemed to be of good quality. The rate of returning to work following a Myocardial Infarction is notably high within one year and is associated with physical, psychological, and social factors, highlighting the need for mechanisms that facilitate this return as promptly as possible. However, further research is necessary, particularly involving diverse populations and distinguishing among different professional categories, to gather more extensive data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.