ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2025
Resource stewardship learning needs in undergraduate medical training: a cross-sectional study.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resource stewardship learning needs in undergraduate medical training: a cross-sectional study.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: No clear guidelines for Canadian medical schools regarding the integration of resource stewardship (RS) in the training of tomorrow's physicians exist. This study aimed to determine the learning needs of undergraduate medical students on RS in Quebec. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all medical students in Quebec from January 12 Results: RS teaching was perceived as being insufficient. Despite 69% of students knowing the existence of Choosing Wisely, only 21.7% considered RS teaching to sufficiently develop their critical thinking. While students claimed that RS's current teaching methods are predominantly theoretical, a preference for more practical learning approaches was noted. Approximately 71% of students undergoing clerkship rotations acknowledged the significance of role models in fostering critical thinking skills related to RS. Heterogeneity was noted across medical schools. Conclusions: This study confirms that according to students' perspective, RS is important yet insufficiently and heterogeneously taught in Quebec. Establishing guidelines regarding RS teaching in medical schools could provide equal learning opportunities. Furthermore, encouraging role models to be part of this teaching effort may also strengthen student's critical thinking regarding RS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.