Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41836194›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2025

Resource stewardship learning needs in undergraduate medical training: a cross-sectional study.

David Houle, Anton Volniansky, Sophie Rodrigues-Coutlée, Merve Kulbay, René Wittmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David HouleMedecine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Anton VolnianskyMedecine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4831-9059
Sophie Rodrigues-CoutléeMedecine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Merve KulbayMedecine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
René WittmerDepartment of family medicine and emergency medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3873-9092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: No clear guidelines for Canadian medical schools regarding the integration of resource stewardship (RS) in the training of tomorrow's physicians exist. This study aimed to determine the learning needs of undergraduate medical students on RS in Quebec. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all medical students in Quebec from January 12 Results: RS teaching was perceived as being insufficient. Despite 69% of students knowing the existence of Choosing Wisely, only 21.7% considered RS teaching to sufficiently develop their critical thinking. While students claimed that RS's current teaching methods are predominantly theoretical, a preference for more practical learning approaches was noted. Approximately 71% of students undergoing clerkship rotations acknowledged the significance of role models in fostering critical thinking skills related to RS. Heterogeneity was noted across medical schools. Conclusions: This study confirms that according to students' perspective, RS is important yet insufficiently and heterogeneously taught in Quebec. Establishing guidelines regarding RS teaching in medical schools could provide equal learning opportunities. Furthermore, encouraging role models to be part of this teaching effort may also strengthen student's critical thinking regarding RS.

Indexed as

Choosing Wiselymedical educationMedical studentsresource stewardship

Identifiers

PMID41836194
PMCPMC12982998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.